ITS Ethics and Problems-Free-Samples for Students-Myassignment

Questions: 1.What are the Ethical problems you identified in your chosen YouTube video? 2.Why are these Ethical problems? 3.Who is responsible for these problems? 4.Who is affected by these problems? 5.What Project Management Strategies could have prevented these problems from arising in the first place? 6.Which of the three actions in your chosen YouTube video is better? Why? 7.What action other than the three in your chosen YouTube video, can best resolve the problems? 8.Who should take the best action? Why? 9.What are the Implications of the best action on the projects time, cost and quality? 10.What are the Consequences of the best action on the Project Stakeholders? Answers: 1.The ethical problem which is seen in the Selected YouTube video is that a software without proper encryption is being delivered to the client. This is basically done due to the factor of time constraint. This directly helps in delivering the project on time but compromise is done in the encryption process. 2.The problem which is seen in the scenario is an ethical problem due to the factor that a software without its basic encryption is liable for hackers to indulge into the system. This makes the system liable to vulnerability. The data in the system can be directly be hacked and the data can be used by the hackers for many activities according to their need. This issue can result in a big problem if the data include personal information of the user which may include password and email addresses. 3.The responsibility of these aspect directly lies in the hand of the developer of the software. There are responsible due to the factor that it is the responsibility of the program director to provide all the necessary security measures. This security measures does not only help in protecting the software but also help in providing a basic framework which provides necessary measures to protect it from hackers (Ding et al., 2014). 4.This problem would directly affect the client. This is due to the factor that the developers tend to deliver the system on time lagging behind the basic concepts of the security (Chen et al., 2016). On the other hand the clients data would be at a risk of getting into the hand of hackers who could use the data for their own purpose (Kumar, Khan Khan, 2015). On the other hand the stakeholders are also affected by means of budgeting constraints due to the factor that it would involve more after sales service such as sending the patch of the encryption and updating the system. This could be very much a haptic job from the point of view of the project manager as this could lead to problem in the near future. 5.The strategy that could have prevented such a situation is extra precaution on the deadline aspect. It should have been considered that the delivery of the project is approaching and it should have been delay in a proper way so that the project meet the necessary deadline. This factor could have been managed by preparing a basic project management schedule. Taking into consideration the waterfall model of the project management could have been taken into consideration. The model provides a basic framework which deals with all the steps which are involved in the process of the software development. 6.Among the three action plans that are being chosen in the YouTube video, the best action that should be taken into consideration is that the program director ignores project manager recommendation (Pires et al., 2016). This action would directly involve delay in the delivery of the project but on the other hand the quality of the product would not be compromised. If the compromise of the sector of the quality is not altered it would directly affect the reputation of the company. And on the other hand after sales service would not be required which involves may added disadvantage. 7.Other option that can help in resolving the issue is that, every client wants the software to be perfect that does not involve any security issue involved in it. The date of the launch of the software can wait until all the security aspects are meet and treated properly. This would result in no issue related to security in the near future. 8.The best action should be taken from the side of the program director who is the overall leader in the main implementation of the software. The security issue that should be implemented in the software so that it is not vulnerable to any security issue is best known by the program director (Sadeghi et al., 2017). The program director in every situation is the main player who plays a very important role in different role from the initiation of the project to the completion of the project and its delivery. 9.The implication of the factor of delaying of the launch would hamper the factor of time which was estimated for the launch but quality can be considered as a factor which should not be avoided in any circumstances. If the factor of the quality is compromised it would directly affect the reputation of the company involved in the manufacture (Scott-Hayward, Natarajan Sezer, 2016). 10.The project stakeholders would be affected by the delay in the delivery of the project. The cost of the project would be affected and this would be a negative aspect leading towards the project. The cost issue can be considered to be the only factor that would be hampering when taking into account the delay of then project delivery. But on the other hand the quality of the software should not be compromised with as it directly involve the reputation of the company. References Pires, R., Pasin, M., Felber, P., Fetzer, C. (2016, November). Secure content-based routing using intel software guard extensions. InProceedings of the 17th International Middleware Conference(p. 10). ACM. Scott-Hayward, S., Natarajan, S., Sezer, S. (2016). A survey of security in software defined networks.IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials,18(1), 623-654. Chen, M., Qian, Y., Mao, S., Tang, W., Yang, X. (2016). Software-defined mobile networks security.Mobile Networks and Applications,21(5), 729-743. Ding, A. Y., Crowcroft, J., Tarkoma, S., Flinck, H. (2014). Software defined networking for security enhancement in wireless mobile networks.Computer Networks,66, 94-101. Sadeghi, A., Bagheri, H., Garcia, J., Malek, S. (2017). A taxonomy and qualitative comparison of program analysis techniques for security assessment of android software.IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering,43(6), 492-530. Kumar, R., Khan, S. A., Khan, R. A. (2015). Revisiting software security: durability perspective.International Journal of Hybrid Information Technology (SERSC),8(2), 311-322.